Commission challenged on misinformationEuropêche has challenged the Commissioner for Fisheries on the content of am “explanatory note” circulated among MEPs

An “explanatory note” on the revision of the EU-fisheries control system reportedly circulated by the European Commission services to a few MEPs, mainly within the Committee on Environment, has come as a shock to fishing industry body Europêche.

The note sounded a note of alarm concerning the position adopted within the Committee on Fisheries (PECH) which it is claimed “could reward and legalise underreporting, lead to massive overfishing and allow illegal discards to continue undetected and threaten the sustainable exploitation of marine biological resources.”

According to Europêche, these statements unfairly question the good record of compliance of EU fleets, damage the image of the sector, and lack both empathy with the industry and connection with fisheries’ realities.

Europêche states that the note clearly interferes the independent co-legislator role of the European Parliament.

Daniel Voces, managing director of Europêche, commented that beyond the skewed content of the note that contains half-truths and apocalyptic statements not based on factual data, what is most shocking to Europêche is the fact that the note seems to be aimed only at a reduced group of like-minded MEPs who do not specialise in fisheries-related issues, with the sole apparent goal of generating political support and momentum to crush the Parliamentary position democratically adopted by the Members of the PECH Committee.

Against this scenario, an open letter has been sent to the Commissioner on behalf of the European fishing sector, making plain their irritation towards a European Commission which portrays its own fishing industry as illegal predators and structural rule- breakers. Europêche perceives this attitude as a seed of an increasing anti-EU sentiment among fishers.

“EU fishers and their organisations wish to have a continued constructive partnership with the European Commission, but this seems increasingly difficult when DG MARE considers and describes its own industry as a destructive force,” Daniel Voces said, commenting that these unfounded allegations add up to the long list of existing problems that the EU fishing industry must already cope with and for which it needs the political support of the European Commission and its Fisheries Commissioner.

These include the Brexit outcome, the implementation of the post-Brexit situation in the North Sea and the NE Atlantic, the spatial claims on fishing grounds by renewable energy and marine protected areas as well as the on-going market impact of Covid-19, just to name a few of them.

In light of the above, Europêche has urged the Commission to stop casting a shadow of suspicion on the sector and its compliance as a whole as well as to respect the democratic decisions adopted by specialised Parliamentary Committees.

“The debate on complex and technical issues, such as the control regulation, should be done in a transparent manner and always seeking the outcome of rational policies which, in the end, will have to be applied by fishers,” Daniel Voces said.

Visit source site

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here